Jupiter class, Mercury class and Odin class retextured image - Battlestar Galactica: War of the Colonies mod for Star Wars: Empire at War: Forces of Corruption. Add media Report RSS Jupiter class, Mercury class and Odin class retextured (view original) embed. View previous next. The series bible implies that the Athena was one of only three ships of Galactica's class to survive the war. As such it is likely that the Athena was one of the battlestars involved in 'Operation Raptor Talon'. Atlantia For the Original Series battlestar, see: Atlantia (TOS). If you think you spotted a really good Callandra (Cally) Tyrol costume at New York Comic-Con, chances are you saw Nicki Clyne. The actress who played the character made an appearance in the full uniform she wore on Battlestar Galactica. Battlestar Galactica TV Series 1978 - 1980 2003 - 2010. That isn't Galactica then. Blood and Chrome confirms at least two Jupiter-class battlestars serving in the Cylon War had two flight pod arms per side, not three.

Hello,We have long been using this sport since I first heard of it'h existance, like numerous followers of the collection I'michael keeping track of the times down until start. Everything that has been presented so considerably makes ideal sense but one point that is staying out like a tender thumb is definitely the Jupiter cIass battlestar. In thé show the galactica (jupiter class) is usually pretty very much described from the get proceed of the miniséries. But as myseIf and several people have got noticed can be the Jupiter cIass shown in thé gameplay will be completley various. The jupiter cIass in the sport offers for instance; Three hands per trip pod, a much puffed out neck of the guitar, and two engines lacking from the center of the 'Engine pod'.

Also please take note that the colonial seal off can be in the wrong place.I perform not desire this game to fall short, I have always been quite searching forwards to it. I feel this problem however, wants to be tackled. I desire to add a enormous thank you to everyone involved in this video game it really does appear attractive.(In no way should this post be regarded an assault on the game or the devs, I'meters just directed out a persistence problem.)AttachmentsAthena neck. (see the large neck and furthermore the location of the colonial seal) Athena neck.png (2.36 MiB) Viewed 4359 moments Athena Flightpod. (notice the third arm rest in the middle) Athena fIightpod.png (2.49 MiB) Viewed 4359 times Athena Motor.png (2.57 MiB) Viewed 4359 moments. BlackLabAnthonyS wrote:Hi fisher2000!

Yep, this will be an deliberate design option by our art team. We're excited to pay respect to what's i9000 arrive before us, and part of that is definitely subtle design changes to bridge some of the visible DNA between the first series and the re-imagined collection. So say we all!Give thanks to you for your instant answer back.

I can defiantly find the influence the TOS offers experienced on this game, and it is definitely a great point as I think the tale of the TOS assists know what Kara is definitely and some of the bass speaker plots etc. Anyhow I am curious if this indicates the Jupiter class collection undergoes main overhauls? Since they cut sides in the developing of these (when Galactica 'fractures her back' in the show). I sense this provides a quite nice item of backstory or the likelihood of a 'nod' in upcoming content material. The airline flight pod hands can sort of explain itseIf as it makes the flight pods sit down closer to the hull, possibly pilots held slamming into the side of the Jupitér, or to allow bigger ships to dock. Therefore as a countermeasure they eliminated the third supply to lengthen the airline flight pods thus getting to draw them in bécause of the fragile structural sincerity during stage leaps. Either way I discover much ease and comfort understanding this had been intentional, I'd glad that there will be motion to tell a story of the GaIactica and her cIass before procedure raptor talon and before blood and stainless-.

Allow me point out again, you men have performed a wonderful job. So state we all! Appear guys this is certainly how this provides been designed I individually including it much better. As for aIl of you stating that they should offer an change package or something let me explain something about hów and why overhauIs are usually conducted. Usually talking when an change is performed it is definitely done to add new technology or modernize an older boat to contemporary standards. Certainly not amount this include removing components constructed in to the structural sincerity of the boat. What y'all are usually suggesting to fix the limb situation.

Appear at will be as an improvement to the authentic design. Today to the guy that provides up Arleigh Burkés. As I have got stated above refute and overhauls are usually made for improvements to include better technologies or modernize. The Airline flight I and Trip II are tool and radar deals of the ArIeigh Burke and will not get rid of anything from thé hull of thé Arleigh Burke. Look at it this method nothing at all on a boat is actually eliminated it will be built upon.

Maddogs1989 composed: Right now to the guy that brings up Arleigh Burkés. As I have stated above refute and overhauls are usually made for improvements to add better technology or modernize. The Airline flight I and Flight II are usually weapon and radar packages of the ArIeigh Burke and will not remove anything from thé hull of thé Arleigh Burke.

Look at it this way nothing at all on a ship is actually removed it is constructed upon.I raise you thé USS Oriskany, án Essex class transporter, who began life looking like this;And ended searching like this;They replaced her whole flight deck and included steam catapults, which would need an underdeck rearrangement. Although not as big of an overhaul as eliminating two pylons fróm a battlestar, yóu have got to consider into account.

We can't develop battlestars to start with.A civilization capable of constructing warships with artificial gravity at almost 1.5kmeters in size is certainly capable to do overhauls, like removing something from that specific vessel. The Trip porch of the Essex had been not really the hull óf the Essex cIass but please how about you learn about its refit rather of omg it looks different it proves my point because I can seriously just publish images of boats all day time that appearance different then when they launched because of credits but this has been because of improvements to their superstructure brand-new radar devices more weapons different tool techniques and yes brand-new flight decks, but the huIls of the mail are usually the exact same that't what specifies the class. What you are speaking about with thé Jupiter class is usually in reality reducing the hull for the benefit of getting rid of an arm rest because of appearance. Furthermore as I stated earlier a refit can be for modernizing. ln the Essex case a fresh flight floor. If you need to pull up looks I can sight several ships that transformed appearance over period, but the framework i.at the.

The hull, which is usually the actual ship remains. The supply is part of this designs hull. Getting rid of it acts no military services purpose and would not really only consist of the structural ethics of the style but put a large weak spot in the shield of the huIl on both sides and to each airline flight pod. It would never ever be accomplished from any military services standpoint.

Mainly because significantly as your arguement goes that because they can build a 1.5kmichael warship with artificial gravity will go. Arrive on really let's not become asinine right here or shall we move into how the colonial destination't enhanced their ftp technology in 2000 yrs since the tribes still left kobol. The entire belief that an overhaul would become accomplished to eliminate a limb for no real cause at all as the previous Artemis got 3 and the going forward Battlestars have 3 is certainly absolutely ludicrous. No you are trying make the television design match into this whén the Jupitérs in this video game are usually redesigns of the ones from the display.

Maddogs1989 wrote:As much as your arguement goes that because they can build a 1.5kmichael warship with synthetic gravity goes. Come on really let's not be asinine here or shall we proceed into how the colonial destination't improved their ftp tech in 2000 decades since the tribes left kobol. The entire thought that an change would end up being done to eliminate a arm for no genuine reason at all as the earlier Artemis got 3 and the going forward Battlestars have 3 is certainly absolutely ludicrous. No you are usually trying create the television design match into this whén the Jupitérs in this game are usually redesigns of the ones from the display.There are numerous changes to the Jupiter one that is definitely in the TV present.

I'meters really enthusiastic about BSG ánd when a fresh story is definitely considered canon. Well guy I on board. I made this line to look for answers from the dévs about the modifications to the Galactica, if this tale had been to end up being regarded as canon after that the modifications to the Galactica would end up being considered canon. For those who are usually unaware In misinformation, canon can be the materials approved as formally component of the story in the fictional world of that tale.

It will be usually contrasted with, or utilized as the schedule for, works of fan misinformation. The alternate terms mythology, schedule, universe and continuity are usually often used, with the former being specifically utilized to relate to a richly detailed fictional cannon needing a large level of suspension system of disbelief (elizabeth.gary the gadget guy. An whole imaginary globe and history), while the other two usually relate to a solitary arch where all activities are straight linked chronologically. Various other instances, the word can indicate 'to end up being accepted by the creator(s). Wiki.My issue has been that the Athéna, which we see in the authentic blog post that I made has been ether changed for the sake of changing it or produced from scrape with pieces missing fróm it, but the dévs reacted stating that it has been made that way intentionally to create some call-bácks to the T0S Galactica.

Today, if you get into account what the term 'Cannon' methods (I don't mean the computer printer) After that really the changes produced don't make much feeling in the continuity. An instance of a BSG video game that was supposed to be canon but discovered itself in its personal alternate. Has been BSG (2003) for first Xbox ánd ps2. All l simply wanted has been the story behind the adjustments to the mail which in thé lore will occur because the Television show provides a increased absorption price when it comes to the sights over the sport so the present is Primary Cannon unless the license holder state governments in any other case. To ignore this is definitely properly to become ignorant to end up being truthful. An illustration of a franchise where most of the lore can be disregarded is superstar trek. With each new episode right now there is definitely continuity errors.

Many of the hardcore supporters are not joyful with star trek finding, they have even more or less disregarded everything ascetically about what made star trek, star trek. I'michael conscious that individuals perform like it and that is definitely OKAY people can including what they including. Therefore, with BSG which I think about much superior to celebrity trek (that is usually my own opinion) I would including to create sure everything moves with the lore.

I understand the present has its very own issues but that is definitely beside the point really. Therefore significantly with BC there are three iterations óf the RDM GaIactica which so far desires the cóntinuity, but because óf some of thé sins fróm BC and thé absence of explanation many followers dismiss the movie completely.It is usually hinted at thát the CoIonials didn't have got FTL memory sticks or the technologies they possess by the period of the present during the éxodus of Kobol, ás the display clarifies that it will be a technical routine. 'All of this has occurred before, and aIl of this wiIl occur again.' Not really all Battlestar's have the two-arm visual. The Valkyrie is usually one that doesn'testosterone levels have got any arms on the air travel pod.

In multiple strings you have got focused on the Hands for the airline flight pod, but this is not really what the focus had been on THIS line. The throat of the 'crocodile head', turret jobs, engine obstructions as well as the arms.The devs possess performed a wonderful job getting that Battlestar experience.

All I would like would become some lore behind it, maybe in an formal publication? Haveatya wrote:Get rid of an unnecessary arm owing to help updates or whatnot, include engines due to the liberated up mass and advances in power production, include new guns for the sake of guns. I really wear't notice an concern here very honestly. A several years can be lots of time to observe advances and modifications. Stealth technology was created, marked advances in Vipers, new munitions, why wouIdn't the exact same advances be relevant to the Battlestars?I actually really like this idea, it would describe the changes and also stick the technology story the show seeks for. Allow's not really forget about they possess the know how to produce a steel which blocks out rays, build ships in room, jump memory sticks, refine gasoline out of a kind of fine sand? It'beds not out of the query and offers been shown to some degree in the present with the BattIestar Pegasus at Scórpia Navy Shipyards.

This entire topic will go around the whole schedule that the Jupitér class in game looks various from the ón in the present. I've already stated that the devs possess already mentioned they remodeled it to become as such. I possess also stated to create such modifications as everyone eIse proposes would mean the creation of entire fresh class of battlestar for various cause as earlier mentioned. Yes the Jupiter'h in the show have eliminated through numerous stages and overhauls.

This getting adding and eliminating of guns armor and techniques. What you are all failing to grasp is certainly that what you are proposing is completely structural in character and eliminating said hands would give up the structural ethics of the ship and place giant fragile areas in the armor. Again you are usually all attempting to create this cruise ship design match that of the displays when this is usually a full redesign of the boat.